Skip to content

Abstract Search

Do you want to avoid the hassle of traveling with your printed poster? IAPHS2026 is pleased to make poster printing available to you through our supplier PosterSessionOnline. Your poster will be professionally reviewed, printed and shipped directly to Portland and you will be able to pick it up from the Poster desk. Click here to learn more.

Primary Submission Category: Mental health/function

Bilingual Protection or Structural Confounding? A Nationally Representative Analysis of Household Language and Pediatric Mental and Behavioral Health Disparities

Authors:  Marina Frimpong, Muntasir Masum,

Presenting Author: Marina Frimpong*

Abstract

Background: The US has substantial disparities in pediatric mental and behavioral health. Prior work suggests children in language-minority households fare better despite socioeconomic disadvantage, a pattern commonly described as the immigrant paradox. Few national studies have examined whether this relationship persists after accounting for adverse childhood experiences (ACEs), a major driver of child mental health. This study assessed whether household language environment is associated with impairing mental and behavioral conditions among US children.

Methods: We analyzed pooled 2020–2022 National Survey of Children’s Health data on children ages 2–17 years. The outcome was any currently impairing mental or behavioral condition, defined by parent-reported diagnosis plus current impairment for anxiety, depression, ADHD, behavioral problems, autism, or developmental delay. Household language was categorized as English-only, bilingual, or non-English. Survey-weighted logistic regression estimated adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), adjusting for demographics, socioeconomic factors, insurance, nativity, urbanicity, survey year, and ACE burden.

Results: One in five children had an impairing condition. Bilingual households had 62% lower odds than English-only households (aOR=0.38, 95% CI: 0.31–0.47), while non-English households showed no difference (aOR=0.96, 95% CI: 0.68–1.38), suggesting a bilingual advantage not shared across all language-minority households. ACE burden showed a strong dose-response pattern; children with 3+ ACEs had over fourfold higher odds of impairment (aOR=4.66, 95% CI: 4.14–5.24). Interaction analyses were null.

Conclusions: This study adds national evidence that bilingual household environments may protect child mental and behavioral health, while underscoring ACE burden as a key target for screening and prevention in diverse US pediatric populations. This has implications for policy and practice.