Skip to content

Abstract Search

← Back to abstract search

Mental health/function

Relationship of Clinical Factors, Self-reported Quality Metrics, Social Determinants of Health, and Treatment Frequency with Long-term Suicide Severity Outcomes

Presenting Author
Sarah Mazen
Health Equity Research Lab, Department of Psychiatry, Cambridge Health Alliance
Submitting Author
Sarah Mazen
Additional Authors
Peyton Williams, Akhil Reddy, Nicholas Carson, Gareth Parry, Benjamin Cook, Albert Lo

Abstract

Background: Suicide among adolescents and young adults is a major public health concern, highlighting the need to understand risk and protective factors. Yet, little is known about the clinical, psychosocial, and treatment-related factors influencing long-term suicide outcomes. This study aims to identify such factors among youth receiving community behavioral health (BH) care.

Methods: The study included 100 adolescents who received outpatient (BH)treatment in a safety-net health system. In 2023, participants completed a follow-up survey, including the (Computerized Adaptive Test – Mental Health; CAT-MH) for current suicide risk and two retrospective self-report measures: treatment experiences (Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems; CAHPS) and social determinants of health (CONNECT-S). Covariates associated with suicide severity were identified using a LASSO model including EHR-based sociocontextual, diagnostic, and service use variables, time to follow-up, CONNECT-S and CAHPS scores. Ordinary Least Squared (OLS) regression provided  estimates of the associations between LASSO-selected covariates and treatment frequency (≥4 vs <4 visits per 3-month quarter) and interaction between CAHPS and treatment frequency.

Results: Ten covariates were selected by the LASSO model. OLS found that any emergency department use during the initial treatment period was associated with an increase in suicide severity of 17.1 [95% CI 1.9, 32.2; p = 0.03]. Preliminary evidence indicated that higher treatment frequency was associated with lower suicide risk severity approximately five years later among youth reporting more positive care experiences; in this group, a 1-point increase in care rating corresponded to a -0.4 reduction in suicide severity [95% CI: -0.8, 0.02; p = 0.06].

Conclusions: Preliminary findings suggest higher intensity care is only likely to be of value if it is of high patient-reported quality. Larger sample confirmatory studies are needed.